Prediction of Jeff Wolf [279th] vs Taro Daniel [122nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W L L
Form
L L W W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Wolf 2 - 1 Daniel
They have played 6 sets in total, with Wolf winning 4 and Daniel winning 2. The last match between Wolf and Daniel was at the Abierto Mexicano Telcel - Acapulco, 27-02-2023, First, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeff Wolf | 2 |
| Taro Daniel | 1 |
| Wolf | Stats | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (6-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (4-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 279 | Ranking | 122 |
| 39 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 26 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 14 |
| 57% (187-142) | Career Total W/L | 58% (573-421) |
| $1,640,225 | Career Prize Money | $2,262,594 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Jeff Wolf
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Taro Daniel
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-4 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 27 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:38:35 | Average Match Time | 1:38:35 |
| 52% (101/195) | 1st Serve % | 60% (115/193) |
| 71% (72/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (74/115) |
| 47% (44/94) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (35/78) |
| 56% (10/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (8/23) |
| 44% (84/193) | Return Points Win % | 41% (79/195) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeff Wolf vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wolf 2 - 1 Daniel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wolf has won 46.49% of points on their second serve, while Daniel has won 43.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wolf, in recent form, has won 54.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 41.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.73% and 21.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wolf has saved 56.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wolf has won 48.84% of matches played (W/L 21/ 22), with Daniel winning 44.26% (W/L 27/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wolf has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 69/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Wolf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 15/ 12), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 16/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Wolf winning 2 times and Daniel being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Wolf winning 4 and Daniel winning 2. The last match between Wolf and Daniel was at the Abierto Mexicano Telcel - Acapulco, 27-02-2023, First, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wolf and Daniel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wolf winning 0 times and Daniel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wolf winning 1, and Daniel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wolf has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.19 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 177.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wolf has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wolf has converted 34.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 25.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jeff Wolf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jeff Wolf
60%
(
6 of
10)
1st Serve %
80%
(
4 of
5)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
9
Total Points Won
6
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Jeff Wolf
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Stefan Kozlov
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
63%
(
72 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
121)
8
Aces
21
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
54 of
79)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
36 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(11) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Jenson Brooksby
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeff Wolf
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Nicolas Mejia
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Daniel Rincon
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Cezar Cretu
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
94%
(
15 of
16)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
21
Total Points Won
26
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Jeff Wolf
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
10
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Wolf vs Daniel?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Wolf Vs Daniel is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (187/142) | Win/Loss | 58% (573/421) |
| 55% (426/348) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1316/1033) |
| 52% (3873/3569) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11470/10587) |
| 0.64 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2343 | Aces Total | 2467 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1076 | Total Double Faults | 1994 |
| 1:39:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 373.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.97 |
| 57% (13226/23086) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35491/56755) |
| 74% (9776/13226) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24080/35491) |
| 51% (5004/9860) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10829/21255) |
| 41% (870/2108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2402/5588) |
| 38% (8866/23317) | Return Points Win % | 39% (21978/55972) |
| 57% (175/307) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (549/934) |
| 50% (9/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 50% (55/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/307) |
| 53% (50/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/297) |
| 89% (176/156) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 11% (176/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 18% (153/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (404/72) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
